Liga MX Femenil Takes Shape: A Match-by-Match Look at Matchdays 3, 4, and 5

Results, performances, and tactical trends that are defining the early season
América v Necaxa - Torneo Clausura 2026 Liga MX Femenil
América v Necaxa - Torneo Clausura 2026 Liga MX Femenil | Cristopher Rogel Blanquet/GettyImages

As Liga MX Femenil advanced into Matchdays 3, 4, and 5, the competition began to move beyond early experimentation and into a phase where structure, depth, and tactical clarity became decisive.

Teams with continuity and strong squad planning started to separate themselves, while others faced growing challenges in maintaining intensity and organization across consecutive fixtures.

This three-matchday stretch offered a revealing snapshot of the league’s current dynamics. While heavy scorelines underlined the power of established contenders, several tightly contested matches highlighted the league’s increasing parity and the importance of game management, especially in compressed schedules.

MATCHDAY 3

Cruz Azul 1–0 Pachuca

Cruz Azul earned a statement victory by disrupting Pachuca’s usual rhythm and limiting their ability to dominate possession in advanced areas. Rather than pressing constantly, Cruz Azul opted for a compact mid-block, forcing Pachuca wide and reducing their effectiveness between the lines.

The match hinged on efficiency and concentration. Pachuca pushed forward in the second half, but Cruz Azul’s defensive discipline and timely interventions preserved the narrow lead, making this one of the most tactically mature performances of the round.

Pumas 3–0 Mazatlán FC

Pumas imposed themselves early with aggressive pressing and quick ball circulation, preventing Mazatlán from settling into the match. Their vertical attacking approach created numerical advantages in wide areas and led to consistent chances.

Defensively, Pumas were equally convincing. Mazatlán struggled to build from the back, often forced into long clearances, allowing Pumas to recycle possession and maintain territorial control throughout the match.

Atlas 1–2 Tijuana

Atlas showed ambition and attacking intent, particularly in transition, but Tijuana proved more composed in decisive moments. The visitors exploited defensive gaps with direct play and effective timing in their runs.

As the match progressed, Atlas increased pressure and generated chances, yet Tijuana’s defensive organization and game management allowed them to absorb pressure and secure a valuable away win.

FC Juárez 1–0 Atlético de San Luis

Juárez approached the match with a pragmatic plan, prioritizing defensive stability and quick transitions. Their compact shape limited San Luis’ space in central areas and forced play toward the flanks.

Once ahead, Juárez managed the game intelligently, slowing the tempo and minimizing risks. San Luis struggled to find creative solutions, highlighting ongoing issues in their attacking build-up.

León 1–1 Tigres UANL

León delivered a disciplined and confident performance, matching Tigres in intensity and physicality. Their ability to press selectively disrupted Tigres’ build-up and prevented prolonged spells of dominance.

Tigres responded with experience, adjusting their positioning and controlling key phases, but León’s organization ensured a balanced contest that reflected the effort and structure of both teams.

Puebla 0–1 Toluca

Toluca displayed patience and control, choosing not to force the tempo against a well-organized Puebla side. Their positional discipline allowed them to wait for openings rather than overcommitting.

Puebla competed defensively but struggled to generate clear chances. Toluca’s ability to protect their lead through structured defending was key to securing the away victory.

América 6–0 Necaxa

América delivered a relentless attacking performance defined by fluid movement and constant pressure. Their rotations in midfield and attack created overloads that Necaxa were unable to contain.

The scoreline reflected América’s depth and sharpness. Even with the match decided early, their intensity remained high, underlining a mentality focused on control and consistency.

Querétaro 0–1 Monterrey

Monterrey controlled the tempo with positional discipline and smart circulation. While they did not dominate possession overwhelmingly, they limited Querétaro’s attacking transitions effectively.

Querétaro remained organized and competitive, but Monterrey’s experience allowed them to capitalize on a decisive moment and manage the match calmly afterward.

Guadalajara 1–0 Santos Laguna

Guadalajara secured a narrow win through defensive solidity and tactical patience. The match was evenly contested, with both teams cautious in their attacking approach.

Santos attempted to increase pressure late, but Chivas’ compact defensive shape and disciplined pressing allowed them to see out the result.

MATCHDAY 4

Pachuca 7–0 Puebla

Pachuca responded emphatically with an explosive attacking display. Their quick ball movement and off-the-ball runs consistently dismantled Puebla’s defensive structure.

As the goals accumulated, Pachuca maintained focus and intensity, using the match to reinforce attacking patterns and confidence after earlier dropped points.

Atlético de San Luis 0–2 América

América controlled the match with maturity, dictating tempo and minimizing defensive exposure. Their ability to progress the ball through multiple phases limited San Luis’ pressing opportunities.

San Luis showed effort but lacked penetration in the final third. América’s efficiency and composure ensured a comfortable away victory.

Tijuana 1–2 FC Juárez

The match was played at a high tempo, with frequent transitions and physical duels. Juárez took advantage of defensive lapses, showing decisiveness in key moments. Tijuana created chances and remained competitive, but Juárez’s compact structure and clinical finishing proved decisive.

Necaxa 0–1 Pumas

Pumas demonstrated patience and control in a match that required persistence. They circulated the ball effectively, waiting for defensive gaps to appear. Necaxa defended with intensity, but Pumas’ consistency and ability to protect their lead highlighted their growing tactical maturity.

Toluca 1–2 Tigres UANL

Toluca competed aggressively and showed attacking initiative, particularly in wide areas. However, Tigres absorbed pressure and relied on their experience to respond effectively. The match highlighted Tigres’ ability to manage adversity, capitalizing on key moments and maintaining control during critical phases.

Santos Laguna 0–0 León

Both teams prioritized defensive organization, resulting in a cautious and structured encounter. Clear chances were limited, with midfield battles defining the game. The draw reflected a balanced contest where risk management took precedence over attacking ambition.

Guadalajara 2–0 Querétaro

Guadalajara controlled the match through sustained pressing and organized buildup play. Their ability to recover the ball quickly allowed them to dominate territory. Querétaro struggled to escape pressure, and Chivas’ efficiency ensured a deserved victory.

Monterrey 2–1 Cruz Azul

Rayadas capitalized on their attacking quality in key moments. Their movement in advanced areas caused problems for Cruz Azul’s defensive line. Cruz Azul remained competitive and organized, but Monterrey’s experience in closing out matches proved decisive.

Mazatlán FC 1–1 Atlas

Both teams displayed balanced approaches, alternating phases of possession and counterattacking play. The match featured limited defensive errors. The draw reflected a fair outcome, with neither side able to impose sustained dominance.

MATCHDAY 5

Atlético de San Luis 2–3 Tijuana

Tijuana approached the match with an aggressive attacking mindset, capitalizing on transitions and defensive gaps. Their pace and directness caused constant problems. San Luis showed resilience and attacking intent, but recurring defensive issues prevented them from securing a result.

FC Juárez 1–1 Cruz Azul

The match was intense and physical, with both teams pressing selectively. Juárez looked dangerous on transitions, while Cruz Azul controlled possession. Neither side was able to fully dictate the game, resulting in a draw that reflected the balance on the field.

Tigres UANL 3–1 Atlas

Tigres asserted control through experience and attacking depth. Their ability to increase tempo in the second half proved decisive. Atlas competed early but struggled to contain Tigres’ attacking movement as the match progressed.

Puebla 1–3 Guadalajara

Guadalajara continued their consistent form with efficient attacking transitions. Their movement between lines created space and chances. Puebla showed moments of attacking promise, but defensive lapses undermined their efforts.

Pumas 1–0 Santos Laguna

Pumas managed another narrow victory through structure and discipline. They controlled possession without sacrificing defensive balance. Santos lacked precision in the final third, and Pumas’ consistency once again made the difference.

América 4–0 Mazatlán FC

América dominated all phases of the match, combining high pressing with fluid attacking play. Mazatlán struggled to cope with the intensity. The result reinforced América’s status as one of the league’s most complete squads.

Querétaro 1–4 Toluca

Toluca imposed their attacking rhythm early, exploiting defensive gaps with quick combinations and movement. Querétaro attempted to respond, but Toluca’s control and efficiency ensured a comfortable victory.

Necaxa 0–6 Pachuca

Pachuca delivered another commanding performance, maintaining high tempo and attacking precision throughout. Necaxa were unable to slow the pace, and Pachuca’s depth allowed them to dominate from start to finish.

León 1–1 Monterrey

The match closed the round with a balanced and disciplined contest. Both teams showed tactical organization and resilience. The draw reflected evenly matched sides, prioritizing control over risk.

Across Matchdays 3, 4, and 5, Liga MX Femenil has begun to reveal clear patterns: dominance from established contenders, growing tactical maturity, and an increasingly demanding environment for teams still building cohesion. As the season continues, consistency and adaptability will be the defining factors in the race for playoff positions.

After this detailed stretch of matches, which team appears the most tactically complete, and which side do you believe still has the potential to exceed expectations later in the season?

Read More:

Loading recommendations... Please wait while we load personalized content recommendations